Network Attached Storage - An Alternative To Tape Back-up

Businesses have been using tape to back up theirbacked up in less time.  
data since the early days of computing.  Tape has• Disk storage has greater longevity than tape, so
its limitations, but it was much cheaper than thethe data is going to be there and accessible when
alternatives, so its use continued.  you need it.
Today, the situation is changing.  The price of disk• Random access to data on disk saves time
storage has come down dramatically and thewhen trying to restore specific files.
performance, longevity and use characteristics of disk• NAS devices are independent, complete
are far superior to tape.  As a result, manysystems that connect directly to your network so
businesses are looking to move away from tape forthey don't impact your other systems.
their backup and disaster recovery needs.• Tape rotation schemes are possible with
The key requirements of an ideal backup schemedisk-based systems and sophisticated ones can
are:eliminate duplicate files for more compact storage.
• It must be economical.  Large amounts of data• For smaller amounts of data, removable disk
need to be accommodated (due to the need todrives mounted in hot-swap enclosures can provide a
keep multiple versions of the data), but in manycompetitive alternative for offsite data storage.
cases the data will never be accessed.  Its• Locating a NAS system in another office and
contribution to the company's bottom line only comesbacking it up over the network provides a fast,
if the data is needed, otherwise, it is an unnecessaryautomated remote backup.  In the event of a
expense.disaster, the backup system is immediately ready to
• It must be reliable over the long term.  Somestep in for rapid recovery and business continuity.
data must be stored for long periods of time,Many businesses are implementing a staged approach,
perhaps decades in some situations, to meetwhere an onsite NAS provides fast backups and
regulatory and business needs.  If that data is everrestores for servers and workstations.  Then, to
needed it must be readable and accessible.  Whenprepare for a disaster that destroys or prevents
tape sits unused for a long period, it gets brittle andaccess to the primary place of business, the data is
is prone to breaking and data loss.automatically replicated to a second NAS at another
• It must be quick and easy to set up andlocation.  For rapidly changing and highly important
operate.  Back-up windows are getting tighter asdata, the on-site and off-site systems can be set up
the hours of operation increase and the amount ofto mirror each other, so that little or no data is lost if
data continues to grow.  As a result, the speed ofdisaster should strike.
the backup is critically important.  If the backupThere are other reasons for deploying a NAS
process can be automated, human errors and costssystem.  By accomplishing multiple goals, the NAS
are reduced.can be even easier to justify. Examples include:
• Restoring data, either individual files or a whole• Additional end user storage.  Centralized
system, must be quick, easy and reliable.  Today, itstorage is easier to back up than data stored on
can take a long time to retrieve tapes from theirmany end user systems.
offsite storage.  Data on tape is stored sequentially• Ideal for central repositories for workgroup or
so access to specific records can be cumbersome. departmental data that must be shared.
Reading the tapes can be problematic if the tape is• Regulation compliance, such as email retention
old, brittle or distorted.  All this uses precious ITrequirements for HIPAA or Sarbannes-Oxley.
resources that would be better spent elsewhere.Even if you decide not to abandon tape backup
Disk storage has none of these issues.entirely, you can use a NAS as a rapid staging server
The NAS Approachto gather the data from other systems quickly during
With prices in the $2 per GB range, Networkyour backup window. Then let the NAS feed the
Attached Storage (NAS) systems are rapidlydata to the tape unit without worrying about time
becoming the ideal, cost-effective back-up solution.constraints.  This is referred to as
• Disk-to-Disk data transfer speeds far exceeddisk-to-disk-to-tape backup.
those of writing to tape, so more data can be