How storage devices works


Getting More Bang for the Storage Buck

In an article titled "No Waiting: Consideringperformance of 100,000 IOPS in a typical OLTP
the Benefits of Solid State Disks,"1 authorsdatabase  I/O  application.
Ramon Sandoval and Maneesha Lee highlighted
the growing popularity of solid state disksHardware  Specifications
(SSDs) as accelerators for enterprise
databases. The authors cited the rapidThe tables below detail the technical
expansion of the SSD industry as a result ofspecifications of the drives and JBOD modules
relational database applications, with SSDsused  in  our  comparative  analysis.
being deployed as storage devices for hot
files2. In particular, Sandoval and LeeIn this study we have selected 15,000rpm
revealed that a major portion of enterprisedrives, the fastest available rotational hard
SSDs are installed in high-end databasedrives in the market today. Both drives
applications running Sybase, Oracle andfeature Fibre Channel interfaces and are
Informix, along with SAP running on top ofenclosed in the same 3.5-inch form factor.
these  databases.Since this analysis will focus more on cost
versus IOPS performance alone, disk capacity
Aside from this write-up, several reports andis  totally  irrelevant  in  this  analysis.
white papers emphasizing the performance
benefits of SSDs have already been published,To cancel out the advantages (and
and hard disk drive makers such as Samsungdisadvantages) brought by JBOD modules from
have expressed interest in this storage line.different manufacturers, this analysis will
The only remaining question is, are SSDs autilize a generic JBOD module that has the
viable alternative for price-conscious buyerssame form factor (2U) and disk capacity (12
who are running performance-hungry OLTP apps?3.5" disks) as the E-DiskSAN S2F-J from
BiTMICRO.
The objective of this article is to examine
the benefits of utilizing flash SSD-enabledDisk/Module  Performance
storage system as cache storage in an
enterprise environment. A comparison will beThere has been a dearth of storage hardware
made between conventional storage systemsliterature that tackles HDD performance as
(featuring HDDs) and solid-state disk-basedmeasured in I/Os per second, as most drive
network storage in terms of performance andmanufacturers publicize disk performance in
overallcost  per  IOPS.terms of MB per second (MBps). However, IOPS
statistics are critical in random access
Market  Trendsapplications such as OLTP and data
warehousing, and storage subsystem suppliers
Storage users are buying more midrange andpost mission-critical IOPS data in their
lower cost systems, according towebsite. Similarly, BiTMICRO Networks
International Data Corp.'s (IDC) quarterlyconducted benchmark tests in November 2003
worldwide disk storage systems reportfor its E-DiskSAN featuring twelve E-Disk
released December 2004. Revenues grew 3.5Fibre Channel channels. IOPS results for a
percent year-over-year to $3.4 billion in thesmall-block (4KB), sustained random read
third quarter of 2004. Although revenueworkloads are posted in the succeeding table.
growth was smaller compared to previous
quarters, IDC noted rapid growth in storageTo compute for the generic JBOD's performance
capacity, rising 50.5 percent year over yearrating, we multiplied the 15,000RPM HDD's
to 310 petabytes. It is the largest growthmaximum IOPS rating of 435 with the maximum
rate posted over the last seven quarters, thenumber of disks in the enclosure (12). The
report  said.result, 5,220, is the theoretical maximum
IOPS  for  small  block  (4KB)  random reads.
IDC analyst Brad Nisbet says the results
confirm the slow but steady growth ofTable 3 figures already show a wide disparity
midrange and lower segments, like ATA-basedin I/O ratings (more than 1100%) both at the
storage. "We saw an increase in the growth ofdrive and at the enclosure levels. To achieve
petabytes shipped, which is yielding thethe desired performance of 100,000 IOPS, we
largest dollar per gigabyte pricing declinesimply add more enclosures and drives in the
in seven quarters and points to a growingJBOD  setup  accordingly  (Table  4).
share of higher-capacity, lower-cost disk
drive deployments and a broader variety ofTo compute for the dollar cost per IOPS, we
products offered by the major vendors," headd up the equipment cost and divide the
explains.amount by the total IOPS generated. Equipment
includes the drives, enclosures, switches and
Another contributing factor to the growth ofcabinet. However, for the purpose of this
networked storage, in particular midrangeanalysis, it is assumed that each setup will
systems, is the stiff price competition amongutilize one switch. Therefore the cost of
sellers in their bid to corner a slice ofswitches may not be included in the
shrinking IT budgets. Price consciousness iscomputation since they would just cancel each
also echoed in the way enterprises handleother out. List prices for the generic JBOD
their storage requirements. Consolidation issetup are based on web prices as of June 29,
now a must as it increases storage2005.
manageability, maximizes capacity
utilization,  and  lowers  overall  TCO.Analysis  of  Results
However, this strategy puts a strain onTo compute for the $ cost per IOPS, the
server performance, especially for I/Ofollowing formula will be used using figures
intensive  applications  such  as:from  Tables  4  and  5.
Aerospace,  telemetry  and  data  acquisitionTotal  IOPS  /  Total  Cost  =  $  per  IOPS
Data backup and recovery as well as migrationTable 6 figures reveal a significant
difference in investment costs when building
Energy  exploration  and  geosciencesa storage system for database/OLTP
applications using a generic JBOD versus an
Medical sciences, including healthcare andE-DiskSAN. On a $/IOPS level, the rotational
imagingHDD-based JBOD array costs 303.8 percent
higher than the E-DiskSAN, thanks to the
Online  transaction  processing  (OLTP)significantly higher I/O rating of the S2F-J
solid state disk subsystem which resulted in
Paging,  log,  journal  and  index  filesa lower number of drives required. Another
factor that drove down equipment cost is the
Still  and  moving  video  surveillancesmaller cabinet space requirement of the
S2F-J (24U) as opposed to the generic JBOD
Video editing and processing, including(48U). In fact, the SSD-based subsystem can
post-productionbe easily integrated into existing data
centers since it is composed of only two 2U
Video  on  demand  and  video  servicesmodules as compared to the 20 modules
required for the HDD-JBOD setup. Removing the
Weather  forecasting  and  simulation24U cabinet (costing $4,298) in the S2F-J
setup  would  drive down $/IOPS even further.
OLTP is a critical segment in enterprise
storage as most banking, trading and supplyConclusion
chain transactions are now transferred
online, with users demanding faster and moreEnterprises are looking for ways to generate
responsive systems. In selecting the mostmore IOPS in the same data center space, as
cost-effective, high-performance storagewell as cost-effective means of scaling their
device for this application, IT and datastorage performance requirements. The
center administrators have HDDs and SSDs asexamples in the preceding section prove that
options. The wide variety of available modelssolid state flash disks are cost effective
in the market and lower price per unit makessolutions for performance hungry
the HDD as the most logical solution forapplications, not only in terms of $/IOPS in
enterprises, providing the best return ongeneral, but also for deferring costly server
investment.  Or  does  it?upgrades in I/O bound applications. This
article focuses mainly on the cost advantages
Cost  Analysisof the SSD subsystem in an equipment level.
The gap between SSDs and HDDs widens further
Let us examine a setup involving a genericwhen other factors such as power consumption
SAN attached JBOD setup comprised entirely ofof 220 rotational hard drives versus 21
15,000RPM rotational HDDs as opposed to asolid-state flash disks, storage space (and
BiTMICRO E-DiskSAN S2F-J featuringthe burden that these subsystems will impose
flash-based E-Disk SSDs. The objective ofon the data center's cooling system), and
this analysis is to compare the capitalbetter reliability (MTBF) are taken into
investment needed to acquire a networkedconsideration.
storage solution that can offer peak



1 A B C D 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110